Status: DETAILED MEDICAL OPERATING SOP DRAFT — human-readable clinical workflow; not yet clinically or operationally approved
CMS baseline: GUIDE RFA Appendix B, Section 5. The Proxi column identifies candidate automation, not functionality already deployed. The executed GUIDE Participation Agreement remains the final requirements check before these tasks are used in the field.
In Person required?, Yes means a person must perform or own the task, Partial means Proxi can perform substantial preparation or routine execution but a person must validate, decide, authorize, or handle exceptions, and No means Proxi can perform the task after the necessary access and approved instructions are in place.
Medical SOP purpose and scope#
This SOP turns the task inventory below into the clinical operating sequence for four kinds of work:
- coordination with a beneficiary's PCP when the PCP is outside the GUIDE care team;
- referral to and closed-loop coordination with a specialist or other clinical provider;
- support during a transition between the beneficiary's residence and a hospital, emergency department, nursing facility, hospice, or another care setting; and
- other clinical coordination needed to manage dementia or a co-occurring condition across the care continuum.
Community-resource and Medicaid HCBS connection work is detailed separately in 15_SOP_Referral_and_Services.md. A safety concern is an interrupt to any coordination route, not a separate referral type.
CMS establishes the Section 5 obligations. The handoff packet, role sequence, teach-back practice, proposed 48-to-72-hour recovery contact, and detailed closure criteria below are Proxi clinical operating design informed by AHRQ transition-safety guidance; they are not additional CMS requirements. Numeric operating clocks remain proposed until O-004 is approved.
Proxi supplies or contracts the assigned labor under the validated Participant and Partner Organization arrangement. The enrolled GUIDE Participant retains nondelegable responsibility for the care-delivery requirement, care-team composition and supervision, clinical quality, disclosure controls, and supporting evidence. External PCPs, specialists, facilities, pharmacies, and emergency services retain responsibility for the acts only they can furnish. Proxi may request, coordinate, prepare, transmit after the required release, and track; it cannot assign or attest an external party's clinical act.
Authority and role assignment#
| Role | Required contribution in this SOP | Prohibited substitution | Review |
|---|---|---|---|
| L0 Proxi software with bounded AI support | Detect a supported trigger; retrieve and organize records; compare factual content; assemble focused packets; create reminders; track attempts, acknowledgments, appointments, and returned documents; prepare source-linked summaries. | Does not determine clinical need, clinical suitability, urgency, treatment, disclosure authority, or closure. | |
| L1 Philippines first-answer and coordination support | Confirm identity, callback number, current location when safely obtainable, office and endpoint facts, appointment or record status, and verbatim external responses; pursue already-authorized records; schedule within approved constraints. | Does not triage, interpret clinical content, relay a new order, select a provider, decide legal authority, or release a materially changed PHI packet. | |
| L2 Puerto Rico dementia care navigator | Receive a prepared packet containing known goals, preferences, barriers, prior attempts, current options, conflicts, and the exact unresolved question; own a required or requested beneficiary relationship; clarify only what remains ambiguous; perform substantive relationship-dependent nonclinical coordination, comprehension recovery, and requested warm introductions. | Is not the default fact collector, option builder, record chaser, or gateway to clinical review. Does not decide clinical necessity, clinical suitability, urgency, capacity, legal authority, treatment, medication reconciliation, or the meaning of conflicting recommendations. | |
| L3 beneficiary-location-authorized RN/LCSW or behavioral clinician | Perform nursing or psychosocial review within actual license and scope; review symptoms, function, transitions, safety, caregiver distress, behavioral-health concerns, and safeguarding needs; escalate medical decisions. | Does not prescribe or perform another profession's restricted act merely because the person is part of the clinical pool. | |
| L4 beneficiary-location-authorized dementia-proficient E/M or prescribing clinician | Determine clinical necessity and urgency; examine or clinically assess as needed; interpret returned clinical information; decide treatment and clinical care-plan effects; prescribe or reconcile medication when the person has the required authority. | Dementia proficiency and prescribing authority must each be verified; one does not automatically establish the other. | |
| L5 external PCP, specialist, discharging clinician, facility, pharmacy, or emergency service | Furnish the outside examination, order, recommendation, treatment, discharge act, dispensing act, emergency response, or acceptance of ongoing responsibility. | Proxi cannot create the outside act or unilaterally make an external clinician responsible. |
The Puerto Rico L2 navigator operation performs no licensed assessment, triage, reconciliation, treatment decision, or individualized clinical instruction. Every such act routes to the separate U.S. clinical workforce. Before that professional acts, confirm the beneficiary's current physical location and the professional's current authority for that jurisdiction and act. If location or authority is unknown, L0-L2 may collect facts and connect the person, but no clinical decision or new instruction may be given through that route. An immediate safety pathway must not be delayed for routine intake questions.
Cross-pillar preparation, no-repeat handoffs, owner acceptance, and shared labor follow 25_GUIDE_Eight_Pillar_Service_Integration.md. Preparation precedes judgment: software and L1 assemble the source-linked packet; L2 enters only under D-021; and a prepared protected question goes directly to the authorized U.S. professional.
Required coordination record#
Every clinical coordination episode must begin with a focused record that contains, as applicable:
- beneficiary identity, current physical location, current care setting, preferred language and communication accommodations;
- reporter identity, decision or disclosure authority when relevant, callback information, and beneficiary preferences for caregiver participation;
- coordination route, trigger, date and source, specific requested outcome, and why the work is needed now;
- current PCP, relevant specialists, prescribing clinicians, facility or agency contacts, and evidence of each current relationship;
- the exact clinical question or requested action, written by or confirmed with the clinician when medical judgment is involved;
- relevant diagnoses and conditions as documented by their sources, current symptoms or observable changes reported verbatim, and the person's cognitive, functional, and behavioral baseline when material;
- current care-plan reference, beneficiary goals and preferences, and only the care-plan content relevant to the recipient and purpose;
- medication and allergy information relevant to the coordination question, clearly distinguishing reconciled regimen, reported use, and unresolved discrepancies;
- recent encounters, transition information, pending tests or results, follow-up appointments, equipment, home services, and known barriers when applicable;
- every source, author, event date, receipt date, correction, and unresolved conflict; and
- requested response, responsible reviewer, return route, and clinically assigned timing.
Unknown, stale, or conflicting information remains labeled as such. A focused clinical packet is not a full-chart dump. AI-generated summaries remain aids; the original records and source-linked facts accompany any clinical review.
Universal safety interrupt#
If a beneficiary, caregiver, provider, or record raises a possible immediate safety issue, new or worsening symptom, medication problem, abuse or neglect concern, behavioral-health crisis, conflicting clinical instruction, or request for urgent medical advice:
- L1 or L2 captures the report verbatim, confirms callback information and current location when safely obtainable, and stops ordinary advice or transmission.
- The approved clinical or emergency pathway is invoked. L1, L2, and AI do not determine urgency, causality, treatment, or disposition.
- An L3 professional may assess or triage only within beneficiary-location authority and approved scope. L4 or the applicable treating clinician makes medical and treatment decisions; emergency services handle immediate threats.
- Failed connection is actively escalated; an attempted call is not a completed handoff.
- The safety disposition and resulting work are recorded separately. Completing the safety handoff does not close the underlying coordination, transition, or medication obligations.
Procedure A — outside-PCP coordination#
- Confirm the PCP and team relationship. Verify the current PCP, practice, effective relationship, and whether the PCP is outside the GUIDE care team. Unknown membership does not default to outside or inside.
- Complete the standing GUIDE duties. Confirm the beneficiary's communication preferences and restrictions, verify the PCP endpoint, and prepare the GUIDE participation notice and current care plan for authorized release. Confirm meaningful access to the current plan; a dormant portal, failed transmission, or superseded plan is insufficient.
- Avoid unnecessary PCP work. Notice, current-plan access, and future plan revisions are standing duties. A stable month does not require an additional PCP call when no specific coordination need exists.
- Define the need-specific request. When an actual coordination need exists, L0/L1 assembles the source-linked need, beneficiary/caregiver's literal requested result, supporting facts, conflicts, prior attempts, and a draft exact question. A clear nonclinical choice may be confirmed directly. L2 resolves only requested or relationship-dependent ambiguity. L3/L4 validates or changes the clinical question, determines clinical urgency, and exercises the protected judgment; the clinician does not gather the routine supporting record.
- Prepare and release the focused packet. Proxi verifies the recipient and assembles the exact approved content. Under V1, an authorized human releases the packet. Proxi may not substitute a recipient, purpose, channel, or content after authorization.
- Track the response without interpreting it. L0 tracks; L1 pursues administrative nonresponse and records replies verbatim. L1 stops when the reply contains a clinical question, contradiction, new instruction, dispute, or safety concern.
- Obtain authorized review. Route clinically material information to the professional whose scope covers the question. Receipt is not acceptance, and recency alone does not resolve conflicting clinical positions.
- Communicate and carry forward. The clinician explains clinical conclusions; L2 explains logistics and reinforces approved content. Update the care plan or record an authorized reviewed-no-change conclusion, assign every resulting action, and preserve unresolved disagreement.
Outside-PCP foundation — detailed task cards#
These four tasks establish the person, team relationship, communication choices, and usable destination before Proxi prepares the GUIDE notice or current care plan. They are event-driven rather than monthly work. Reopen the affected task when the beneficiary, PCP, care-team roster, participation preference, or routing information changes, becomes stale, conflicts with another source, or fails in use.
The evidence labels below describe what a source actually proves:
- Direct evidence establishes the narrower fact the source records. For example, a Medicaid or managed-care PCP field can directly establish the payer's administrative assignment and effective date, but it does not by itself establish whom the beneficiary regards as the current treating PCP.
- Corroborating evidence supports or challenges a candidate fact but cannot establish that fact alone. Claims establish dated utilization by the named billing or rendering provider, not a current PCP designation.
- Identity-only evidence helps identify or contact a provider. It does not establish a beneficiary relationship, payer assignment, GUIDE-team membership, permission, or a current clinical endpoint.
The labor estimates are provisional Proxi workload-calibration assumptions, not CMS requirements, service clocks, staffing guarantees, or field observations. Clean-path minutes are expected Proxi human labor; automated processing time and beneficiary, representative, practice, or payer time are excluded. All four foundation tasks can be zero Proxi human minutes when current sources yield a prepared candidate packet, the beneficiary/representative supplies a clear authenticated confirmation directly, and the practice-managed endpoint is current. When manual PCP identity, roster, contact, or routing resolution is actually required, use one shared 13-minute Philippines administrative exception allowance for the outside-PCP foundation episode rather than adding 13 minutes to each failed task. L2 time exists only for required/requested human service, ambiguity, disagreement, distress, accessibility failure, no-PCP relationship work, or useful confirmation; it is not a default validation charge. Replace all assumptions with measured pilot data.
Confirm the current PCP#
When. Complete at initial coordination setup; whenever PCP information is missing, conflicting, stale, or reported changed; after a transition that may have changed the primary-care relationship; and before the first outside-PCP GUIDE notice or care-plan exchange.
What and how much. Establish one truthful outcome: (1) current PCP confirmed, including the individual clinician and practice; (2) the beneficiary currently has no PCP; or (3) unresolved. An unresolved result keeps this task open and does not default to the provider seen most often.
Data inputs.
- Direct: the current statement of a capable beneficiary; a representative acting under established authority; authenticated confirmation from the PCP practice; or a current authoritative clinical record that explicitly designates the clinician as PCP. A state or managed-care PCP assignment record is direct only for the administrative assignment it records, not for the beneficiary-identified or actual treating relationship (
SRC-NC-MEDICAID-PCP-ASSIGNMENT). - Corroborating: beneficiary-authorized payer claims, encounters, and payer-maintained clinical data (
SRC-CMS-PATIENT-ACCESS-API); Medicare Parts A, B, and D claims available through beneficiary-authorized Blue Button 2.0 (SRC-CMS-BLUE-BUTTON); recent primary-care encounters; referrals; orders; care plans; and HIE records. These can identify candidates or conflicts but do not select the current PCP by frequency. - Identity-only: NPI/NPPES, licensure records, payer provider directories, public practice websites, maps, addresses, and phone listings (
SRC-CMS-NPI-FACT-SHEET;SRC-CMS-PROVIDER-DIRECTORY-API).
Potential Proxi work. With the required access and beneficiary authorization, pull candidate PCP data from payer, claims, EHR, HIE, and directory sources; retain each source and as-of date; normalize clinician, NPI, practice, and alias information; present the candidates for confirmation; record corrections; and route unresolved conflicts. Proxi must keep payer-assigned PCP, beneficiary-identified PCP, and observed treating providers as separate facts.
Human role. The beneficiary or properly authorized representative supplies or confirms the relationship after software presents the source-linked candidates. No Proxi human is needed for a clear authenticated confirmation. L1 Philippines support performs administrative candidate cleanup or manual office verification only when the shared exception is triggered. L2 enters only when the person requests human help or ambiguity, disagreement, distress, accessibility failure, a no-PCP relationship problem, or relationship-dependent coordination remains. Software applies the approved representative-authority and disclosure rule. Missing identity or office facts return to L1; missing preference, relationship, or permission facts return to L2. Only a complete verified fact pattern that exposes a genuine legal-authority question not answered by the approved rule routes to Healthcare Legal Counsel under O-021, while the affected act remains held.
Provisional clean-path Proxi human time. 0 Puerto Rico navigator minutes for a clear authenticated direct confirmation. Use the shared 13-minute Philippines administrative exception only when administrative PCP-identity or manual-contact resolution is triggered; add L2 only for the human-entry conditions above.
Completion evidence. Record the outcome; clinician and practice; NPI when available; as-of and confirmation dates; confirming person and their authority; sources considered; and the disposition of every conflicting PCP candidate. A confirmed no-PCP outcome is truthful completion of this fact-finding task but does not establish an outside-PCP duty.
What does not prove completion. A recent claim, payer assignment alone, prescribing clinician, hospital attending, directory result, old EHR field, practice address, unanswered outreach, or a model-generated “most likely PCP.”
Confirm whether the PCP is outside the GUIDE care team#
When. Complete immediately after the current PCP is confirmed and repeat when either the PCP identity or GUIDE care-team membership changes.
What and how much. Produce one determination: inside the GUIDE care team, outside the GUIDE care team, or not yet determined. Unknown does not default to inside or outside.
Data inputs.
- Direct: the confirmed PCP identity and the Participant's authoritative current GUIDE practitioner roster or authenticated Participant confirmation of team membership.
- Corroborating: EHR care-team designations, Participant scheduling records, enrollment documentation, and organizational affiliation.
- Identity-only: NPI/NPPES, licensure, public or payer directories, practice address, group affiliation, and claims. These may improve identity matching but do not establish GUIDE-team membership.
Potential Proxi work. Normalize the PCP and roster identities; compare unique identifiers; identify aliases, practice changes, and same-name/different-provider cases; record the roster's effective date; and repeat the comparison after an authoritative PCP or roster change.
Human role. No Proxi human is needed for an exact unique-identifier match against an authoritative current roster. L1 or the Participant's operations owner resolves missing identifiers, stale rosters, ambiguous identities, or disputed membership; L2 owns any resulting beneficiary coordination.
Provisional clean-path Proxi human time. 0 minutes. Use the shared 13-minute Philippines administrative exception only when manual roster or identity resolution is triggered.
Completion evidence. Record the PCP identifier, authoritative roster source and effective date, match result, and the source and disposition of any human resolution.
What does not prove completion. Failure to find a name, a different address or organization, absence from an EHR screen, a claim from outside the Participant, or comparison against a stale or incomplete roster.
Confirm participation and communication preferences#
When. Complete during the first coordination interaction; before using a new channel or involving a caregiver or representative; and whenever preference, capacity, authority, language, accessibility, safety, or contact information changes.
What and how much. Create one current participation profile covering how the beneficiary wants to participate; preferred and fallback channels; language and accessible format; safe contact times and voicemail or message restrictions; who the beneficiary wants included and for what purpose; and explicit do-not-contact or disclosure restrictions. Preference and legal disclosure authority remain separate: asking to include a daughter records a preference but does not by itself settle the permission basis under O-021.
Data inputs.
- Direct: current choices expressed by the beneficiary; choices made by a representative acting within established authority; current communication restrictions; and applicable authorization or representation records.
- Corroborating: prior successful communication, care-plan preferences, documented language and accessibility needs, and prior navigator notes.
- Identity-only: emergency-contact fields, caregiver lists, portal-proxy records, payer contact records, phone numbers, and email addresses. These identify a possible contact but do not establish current preference or disclosure authority.
Potential Proxi work. Conduct an accessible text, voice, or portal interview; explain each option in plain language; read the resulting profile back; accept corrections; retain the source and date; apply explicit channel restrictions; send missing administrative facts to L1 and preference, relationship, or permission facts to L2; and re-evaluate the approved rule after correction. Proxi does not decide capacity or legal authority. A complete verified fact pattern that the approved rule does not cover holds only the affected act; only a genuine unresolved legal-authority question routes to Healthcare Legal Counsel.
Human role. The beneficiary or properly authorized representative makes the choices directly after software presents the current profile for confirmation. No Proxi human is needed on a clear accessible path. L1 Philippines support may perform bounded contact cleanup under the shared administrative exception. L2 enters only for a required/requested human conversation, inaccessible automation, ambiguity, conflicting wishes, distress, family disagreement, or relationship-dependent clarification. Software applies the approved identity, permission, recipient, purpose, content, channel, and restriction rule. Missing facts return to L1 or L2 according to the fact; only a complete verified fact pattern that exposes a genuine unresolved legal-authority question routes to Healthcare Legal Counsel. Possible decision-specific capacity questions route directly to the authorized clinician or Healthcare Legal Counsel rather than through L2.
Provisional clean-path Proxi human time. 0 Puerto Rico navigator minutes. Use the shared 13-minute Philippines administrative exception only for bounded manual contact cleanup; add navigator or clinical time only when its specific entry condition occurs. Healthcare Legal Counsel time is event-driven only for a genuine uncovered legal-authority question, not for routine disclosure-rule application.
Completion evidence. Record the current participation profile; who supplied it and their authority when applicable; confirmation date; communication and disclosure restrictions; accessibility needs; and any unresolved authority issue as a separate open matter.
What does not prove completion. Prior message delivery, silence or lack of objection, a caregiver possessing the phone, an emergency-contact designation, portal access, an old preference, or payer demographics.
Verify PCP routing information#
When. Complete after PCP and practice identity are confirmed and before the first GUIDE notice or care-plan release. Reopen after failed delivery or whenever the practice, department, endpoint, accepted document type, or channel changes.
What and how much. Verify at least one accepted route for the GUIDE participation notice and at least one route capable of providing meaningful access to the current care plan. The same endpoint may satisfy both only when the practice confirms that it accepts both content types.
Data inputs.
- Direct: authenticated confirmation from the receiving practice or records department identifying the exact department, endpoint, channel, and accepted document type; or a current practice-managed clinical-routing record.
- Corroborating: Participant EHR directories, HIE or Direct directories, payer Provider Directory API results, recent referral responses, and prior successful exchanges (
SRC-CMS-PROVIDER-DIRECTORY-API). These are candidates for verification, not proof that the current endpoint accepts this packet. - Identity-only: NPPES addresses and phone numbers, claims billing addresses, public websites, general switchboards, search results, and commercial fax listings (
SRC-CMS-NPI-FACT-SHEET).
Potential Proxi work. Aggregate and normalize candidate phone, fax, electronic, and mailing endpoints; compare sources and dates; detect conflicts, changed destinations, and bounces; present the selected route for verification; retain the verification response; and reopen the task after delivery failure. Packet authorization and release remain separate work under O-021.
Human role. No Proxi human is needed when an authenticated current practice-managed route exists and matches the confirmed PCP and content type. L1 records/coordination support verifies uncertain routes with the practice and resolves discrepancies. Software separately applies the approved recipient, purpose, content, channel, permission, and restriction rule. Under D-007, any V1 human-release act remains SOP DESIGN BLOCKED — NOT OPERATIONAL until O-021 names its actual canonical performer; endpoint verification does not authorize disclosure. Only a genuine uncovered legal-authority question routes to Healthcare Legal Counsel.
Provisional clean-path Proxi human time. 0 minutes. Use the shared 13-minute Philippines administrative exception only when manual endpoint resolution is triggered. This estimate excludes the separate V1 human-release act; that act cannot run until O-021 names its actual canonical performer.
Completion evidence. Record the matched PCP and practice, receiving department, endpoint and channel, accepted content type, verification source, named confirming party when applicable, verification date, and fallback route.
What does not prove completion. A valid-looking fax number, fax transmission success, absence of an electronic bounce, prior use of the endpoint, a general office number, claims address, or directory listing. Routing verification also does not prove that the GUIDE notice was delivered or that the PCP obtained meaningful access to the current care plan.
Procedure B — specialist or other clinical-provider referral#
- Prepare the referral-decision packet. L0/L1 retrieves and organizes the reported need, relevant current records, prior referrals/results, contradictions, current location, coverage and access facts, and a draft clinical question. Software presents known location, language, accessibility, modality, schedule, transportation, caregiver, and other constraints for direct beneficiary/caregiver confirmation rather than asking a navigator to gather them again.
- Establish the clinical branch and practical choice. A qualified clinician reviews the prepared packet and determines whether referral is clinically appropriate, degree of urgency, provider type, question to be answered, and required return result. RFA §5.2 permits this referral branch; it is not mandatory for every beneficiary. Software/L1 verifies directory and availability facts. The beneficiary may make a clear prepared choice directly; L2 enters only for requested help, ambiguity, disagreement, distress, accessibility failure, warm introduction, or relationship-dependent practical fit. Clinical suitability stays with L3/L4/L5.
- Identify the PCP obligations. Determine the current PCP and whether active co-management exists. Unknown is not no. Prepare the required PCP referral notice and, when the PCP is actively co-managing, the clinically appropriate consultation.
- Obtain any lawful order or authorization. The authorized clinician creates any required referral order. L0/L1 handles coverage and administrative documentation without creating clinical content.
- Prepare the referral packet for authorized release. Include the exact clinical question, pertinent source-linked facts, relevant care-plan content, requested response, and return route. Optional notice to the specialist and optional care-plan sharing remain distinct from mandatory PCP notice.
- Complete a requested introduction. When requested by the beneficiary or GUIDE caregiver, an approved care-team member makes a human-authored introduction to the new provider through the approved modality after the separate disclosure basis and exact content are confirmed. This is distinct from transmitting the referral and need not be a synchronous three-way call unless policy requires it.
- Support access. Schedule, address practical barriers, and confirm the disposition. An appointment date is not an encounter, and an encounter claim is not correctly matched clinical documentation.
- Retrieve the result. After an encounter, obtain the correctly matched visit documentation and any recommendations or changes. Partial, illegible, wrong-patient, wrong-encounter, unsigned, or internally inconsistent material does not satisfy the return obligation.
- Reconcile the clinical result. The authorized clinician compares the returned recommendation with the current care plan, medication regimen, PCP plan, other specialist positions, beneficiary goals, and current circumstances. Conflicts remain withheld from instruction until resolved by the proper authority.
- Explain and execute the next plan. The clinician explains findings and medical decisions; L2 explains coordination steps, supports beneficiary choice, and uses teach-back for reviewed instructions. L2 records and routes every clinician-authorized follow-up to its established internal owner and coordinates execution; L2 does not authorize clinical work or assign responsibility to an external party.
- Close truthfully. Apply the successful or non-success criteria below. Referral rejection, scheduling, a safety handoff, or exhausted administrative attempts do not by themselves establish successful closed-loop completion.
Procedure C — transition between residence and a care setting#
- Classify the transition factually. Confirm the from/to settings, unit or level of care when known, transition direction, event and awareness dates, current location, expected duration, and whether another transition is planned. Do not infer RCC, memory-care, hospice-benefit, or long-term-nursing status from a facility name.
- Begin support even when records are missing. Missing discharge information is not evidence of no change. L0/L1 immediately pursues and organizes available records, prior instructions, known supports, missing items, and candidate current needs. An urgent or required live-human route begins immediately while preparation continues in parallel.
- Confirm only what sources cannot establish. Present the prepared transition facts to the beneficiary or permitted caregiver and ask them to confirm, correct, and supply what happened, what they understand, current lived needs/supports, and how they want Proxi to help. L2 joins only for a required/requested human recovery conversation, ambiguity, distress, disagreement, accessibility failure, or relationship-dependent barrier. For discharge home, the proposed Proxi target is a recovery contact within 48 to 72 hours, informed by AHRQ RED; this is not a CMS deadline and remains subject to
O-004. - Obtain the transition packet. Seek the discharge or transfer summary, instructions, medication lists and orders, diagnoses as documented by the treating source, pending tests and results, follow-up appointments, warning signs supplied by clinicians, equipment, home-service orders, dietary or activity instructions when material, and responsible contacts.
- Perform clinical and psychosocial review when triggered. Software/L1 builds the structured source-faithful transition report from records and direct beneficiary/caregiver statements, preserving missing and conflicting facts. The prepared packet routes directly to L3 when symptoms, change from baseline, safety concerns, medication discrepancy, psychosocial or safeguarding concern, unreliable information, or a clinically designated high-risk transition is present. L4/L5 enters for medical decisions. L2 is not a clinical gateway and supplies only genuinely needed relationship context. Routine stable transitions do not require automatic licensed review unless Proxi explicitly adopts that broader clinical-service design.
- Complete the linked medication work. Compare pre-transition regimen, facility administration, discharge orders, pharmacy events, household supply, and reported current use. Merely opening the Medication Management case is insufficient; the route-specific authorized clinician must produce the applicable reconciliation outcome.
- Assign every pending clinical result. Record each pending test, laboratory result, imaging result, pathology result, specialist recommendation, or other unresolved clinical item; name who will obtain it, who is clinically responsible for reviewing it, how the result returns, and what happens if it does not arrive.
- Make follow-up executable. Confirm the purpose, responsible clinician, date or scheduling need, location, modality, transport, interpretation, accessibility, and required records for each follow-up visit or test.
- Confirm equipment, services, and basic supports. Verify delivery and usability of ordered equipment and home services and address food, transportation, personal care, housing, caregiver, and other practical needs through the appropriate Proxi service.
- Obtain higher-authority clinical disposition. L4 or the applicable treating clinician resolves new symptoms, conflicting instructions, unclear treatment ownership, clinical deterioration, medication decisions, or a need to alter the medical plan.
- Communicate with teach-back. Provide an accessible, clinician-approved recovery summary covering the current plan, medication instructions, follow-up, pending results, equipment and services, and the approved route for problems. Ask the beneficiary or permitted caregiver to explain the plan back in their own words; re-explain and add support when understanding remains incomplete.
- Follow through. Confirm medication access and reported implementation, appointments, results, equipment, home services, caregiver availability, and whether new problems or another transition occurred. A new transition starts linked work without erasing the prior episode.
- Reconcile the care plan. Update current setting, providers, responsibilities, services, goals, and accepted clinical recommendations, or record an authorized reviewed-no-change conclusion.
- Close only when the transition criteria below are met. A clinically safe provisional plan may allow immediate care to continue, but it does not prove that missing records, medication, results, equipment, services, or communication obligations are complete.
Procedure D — additional clinical coordination#
- Define the unmet need, beneficiary's desired result, and whether the need is factual, practical, clinical, behavioral, privacy-related, or mixed.
- Identify the person or organization with actual authority and practical ability to act; do not assign an external clinician unilaterally.
- Obtain clinical definition and urgency from the appropriate licensed professional when needed.
- Assemble and release a focused packet through the approved process, track the response, and route the returned content without interpreting it administratively.
- Obtain the authorized disposition, explain it through the correct role, update the care plan when needed, and assign every resulting task.
Proposed timing and escalation#
| Event | Operating expectation | Status | Review |
|---|---|---|---|
| Possible immediate safety threat | Invoke the approved emergency pathway immediately; do not wait for routine records or identity cleanup beyond what is needed for safe connection. | Existing safety principle; exact pathway under O-004 | |
| Time-sensitive clinical concern | Same-shift clinical connection is the current provisional target. | Provisional under O-004 | |
| Discharge to home | Proposed recovery contact within 48 to 72 hours; use clinically assigned earlier timing when risk requires it. | AHRQ-informed Proxi design, not CMS timing | |
| Routine specialist or PCP coordination | Timing follows clinician-assigned urgency, appointment or discharge deadline, and the approved external-response policy. | Exact retry and escalation clocks open under O-004/O-020 | |
| Medication change or discrepancy | Follow the Medication Management SOP; no new medication instruction is released until its authority and concurrence requirements are satisfied. | CMS §7 and O-028/O-029 | |
| Follow-up after a clinical decision | The deciding clinician defines the monitoring interval, responsible reviewer, expected information, and earlier-contact conditions. | Required Proxi design; clinical details case-specific |
Objective completion criteria#
| Route | Successful completion requires | Truthful non-success requires | Review |
|---|---|---|---|
| Outside-PCP baseline duty | Current PCP and outside-team status confirmed; GUIDE notice released; meaningful access to the current care plan established; future revision route recorded. | Specific unresolved duty, attempts, reason, risk, responsible owner, and next plan; no claim that a failed portal or transmission supplied access. | |
| Outside-PCP need-specific coordination | Focused request released; response or authorized disposition obtained; clinical content reviewed by the correct professional; care-plan effect recorded; beneficiary informed; resulting work assigned. | Exact unanswered or refused request, bounded attempts, clinical risk disposition, continuing owner, and next plan. | |
| Successful specialist referral | Encounter confirmed; correctly matched documentation received; recommendations clinically reviewed; PCP notice completed; care plan updated or reviewed-no-change recorded; beneficiary informed; resulting work assigned; and any requested introduction is completed, withdrawn, dispositioned after a capable-beneficiary/caregiver conflict, refused by the provider, or recorded as an explicit failed-introduction outcome with the next plan. An attempt alone is insufficient. | Not applicable. These elements are the successful closed-loop standard under D-009. | |
| Specialist referral without an encounter | No-encounter reason such as beneficiary refusal, cancellation, clinical withdrawal, unavailability, loss to follow-up, status change, or beneficiary-chosen indefinite wait; alternatives, risk response, beneficiary choice, and next plan recorded. | This is itself a typed non-success outcome and must not be called successful closed-loop completion or require nonexistent visit documentation. | |
| Transition | Current setting and support plan confirmed; required records obtained or the unresolved record has an authorized safe disposition; linked medication outcome complete; pending results, appointments, equipment, and services each have an outcome and owner; clinical concerns dispositioned; accessible instructions and teach-back documented; care-plan effect recorded; follow-up complete or accepted by a named continuing owner. | Every unresolved obligation, risk, failed attempt, beneficiary choice, responsible owner, safeguard, and next action recorded without a false completeness claim. | |
| Additional coordination | Requested action or information outcome obtained; appropriate clinical review complete; beneficiary communication and care-plan effect recorded; all child work assigned. | Exact unmet result, reason, risk, owner, and safe next plan recorded. |
Cross-pillar coordination feeds#
This SOP participates in cross-pillar episodes under 25_GUIDE_Eight_Pillar_Service_Integration.md. Care Coordination receives service attribution only for a returned outside response, working care handoff, completed transition obligation, or truthful unresolved external dependency that the correct owner reviewed and carried into ongoing care. A request sent, appointment booked, record received, or owner assigned is not the result by itself.
| Direction | Named feeds | Local handling and result | Review |
|---|---|---|---|
| Inbound to Care Coordination | Comprehensive Assessment; Care Plan; Ongoing Monitoring and Support; 24/7 Access; Medication Management; Referral and Services; Caregiver Education and Support | Accept an exact outside-provider, transition, record, equipment, home-service, or response obligation. Reuse prior facts and attempts; obtain only missing current facts. | |
| Outbound from Care Coordination | Comprehensive Assessment when baseline changes; Care Plan; Ongoing Monitoring and Support; 24/7 context; Medication Management; Referral and Services; Caregiver Education and Support | Return the actual outside response or event, its source and limits, responsible reviewer, remaining dependency, and next owner. Receipt or owner acceptance is not clinical review or downstream completion. |
One provider call or transition conversation may satisfy several coordination tasks and feed several pillars. Count its shared preparation, call, and documentation minutes once; record later clinician, pharmacy, referral, or service-delivery acts once in their owning work.
Documentation and audit record#
The coordination record must show:
- trigger, route, identity, current location, beneficiary/caregiver participation, and applicable authority facts;
- source-linked facts and unresolved conflicts presented to each human reviewer;
- clinical question, clinician identity, credentials, beneficiary-location authority, decision, and rationale where clinical judgment occurred;
- exact recipient, purpose, approved content, releasing human, channel, release time, and delivery/receipt/access evidence for every outbound PHI packet;
- every attempt, response, appointment, encounter, returned document, and reconciliation result without treating one as another;
- beneficiary choice, refusal, requested introduction, explanation, accessibility support, and teach-back result;
- care-plan and medication effects, pending-result ownership, follow-up assignments, and new linked work; and
- the route-specific successful or non-success outcome and the evidence supporting it.
Open all 63 task proceduresDetailed task inventory
The inventory below names accountable work and source order; it is not a mandatory human sequence. Apply the authority table and D-021: software prepares the clean path, L1 handles bounded manual or external-endpoint exceptions, L2 enters only for the named human or relationship conditions, and protected clinical questions route directly to the authorized U.S. professional. In particular, communicating an additional clinical result or confirming follow-through has zero L2 on the prepared clean path; L2 minutes occur only for required or requested relationship clarification, accessible human explanation, distress or disagreement, or another named D-021 condition. The clinician, not L2, explains a clinical conclusion.
| Task | What the task entails | GUIDE anchor | What Proxi can do | Person required? | Person or role | Review |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Outside-PCP coordination — identify the need | Recognize that the beneficiary's PCP is outside the GUIDE care team and that coordination is required. | RFA App. B §5.1 | Compare the recorded PCP against the GUIDE team roster and place the case on the navigator's work list. | Partial | Care navigator validates the match. | |
| Outside-PCP coordination — confirm the current PCP | Ask the beneficiary or caregiver who currently serves as PCP and resolve outdated, conflicting, or missing information. | RFA App. B §5.1 | Present existing PCP information, collect corrections, and search available directories. | Yes | Care navigator; beneficiary or authorized caregiver supplies or confirms the information. | |
| Outside-PCP coordination — confirm the PCP is outside the team | Verify that the PCP is not a member of the GUIDE Participant's care team before applying the outside-PCP workflow. | RFA App. B §5.1 | Match the PCP's identity against the current GUIDE practitioner roster. | Partial | Care navigator handles uncertain identities or roster discrepancies. | |
| Outside-PCP coordination — confirm participation and communication preferences | Confirm how the beneficiary wants to participate and whether an authorized caregiver or representative should be included. | RFA App. B §5.1; person-centered delivery | Ask the standard preference questions and record the answers for the navigator. | Yes | Care navigator; beneficiary or legal representative. | |
| Outside-PCP coordination — verify PCP routing information | Confirm the PCP's practice, phone, fax, electronic exchange address, mailing address, and preferred route for clinical information. | RFA App. B §5.1 | Look up available contact data, compare sources, and prepare a verification call or message. | Partial | L1 verifies the administrative destination with the practice; L2 enters only for a relationship-sensitive beneficiary question. | |
| Outside-PCP coordination — notify the PCP of GUIDE participation | Tell the outside PCP that the beneficiary is participating in a dementia care management program. | RFA App. B §5.1 | Prepare the approved notification using verified recipient and beneficiary information; record authorized release and delivery evidence. | Partial | L2 owns the beneficiary relationship and handles questions; software applies the approved disclosure rule. The separate V1 release act remains SOP DESIGN BLOCKED — NOT OPERATIONAL until O-021 names its canonical performer. | |
| Outside-PCP coordination — give the PCP access to the current care plan | Send or otherwise make the current person-centered care plan available through a permitted channel. | RFA App. B §5.1 | Retrieve the current approved plan, prepare it for the verified destination, and record authorized release, delivery, and meaningful access evidence. | Partial | L1 verifies the recipient, current plan version, destination, and delivery facts; L2 handles relationship or access exceptions; software applies the approved disclosure rule. The separate V1 release act remains blocked under O-021 until its canonical performer is named. | |
| Outside-PCP coordination — send revised care plans | Provide the PCP with an updated or revised care plan whenever the plan changes. | RFA App. B §5.1 | Detect an approved revision and prepare the exact current plan for authorized release to the verified PCP destination. | Partial | L0 tracks every approved revision; L1 corrects delivery facts; L2 handles failed-access or relationship exceptions. Software applies the approved disclosure rule. The separate V1 release act remains blocked under O-021 until its canonical performer is named. | |
| Outside-PCP coordination — request needed PCP information or input | Ask the PCP for records, history, clinical input, or action needed to coordinate dementia care or co-occurring conditions. | RFA App. B §§5.1, 5.5 | Draft a focused request from the identified need and attach the exact approved information for authorized release. | Yes | L2 formulates the nonclinical coordination request; L3/L4/L5 defines clinical questions when needed; L1 verifies the destination and pursues the returned record. Software applies the approved disclosure rule, and the separate V1 release act remains blocked under O-021 until its canonical performer is named. | |
| Outside-PCP coordination — track the PCP response | Watch for a response and identify when the requested information or action has not arrived. | RFA App. B §§5.1, 5.5 | Match incoming messages and documents to the request and produce reminders for overdue items. | No | No person for routine tracking; care navigator receives exceptions. | |
| Outside-PCP coordination — resolve failed delivery or nonresponse | Correct bad contact information, resend through another permitted channel, telephone the practice, or identify a new contact when the request cannot be completed. | RFA App. B §§5.1, 5.5 | Detect failed transmissions, show prior attempts, suggest alternate verified channels, and prepare a resend. | Partial | L1 verifies or corrects the endpoint and prepares an unchanged resend; software re-evaluates the approved recipient, channel, purpose, content, and permission rule. Any V1 human release remains blocked under O-021 until its canonical performer is named. | |
| Outside-PCP coordination — route returned information | Deliver the PCP's response or record to the correct GUIDE team member without treating receipt as clinical acceptance. | RFA App. B §§5.1, 5.5 | Identify the response, associate it with the beneficiary and request, and place it in the named reviewer's work. | Partial | Care navigator resolves ambiguous or misdirected responses. | |
| Outside-PCP coordination — review clinical information | Interpret PCP information, decide whether it changes care, and identify any needed clinical action. | RFA App. B §§5.1, 5.5 | Summarize the returned information and highlight differences from the current care plan for human review. | Yes | GUIDE clinician with dementia proficiency and, when appropriate, the beneficiary's PCP. | |
| Outside-PCP coordination — discuss resulting actions | Explain any resulting options, recommendations, or next steps to the beneficiary in understandable language. | RFA App. B §§5.1, 5.5 | Prepare a plain-language summary and a list of questions for the conversation. | Yes | Care navigator for nonclinical explanation; GUIDE clinician or PCP for clinical advice. | |
| Outside-PCP coordination — reflect the outcome in ongoing care | Add accepted information to the care plan and start any follow-up created by the PCP exchange. | RFA App. B §§5.1, 5.5 | Draft the relevant care-plan changes and create a concrete follow-up list. | Partial | Care navigator updates operational content; GUIDE clinician reviews clinical content; beneficiary leads care-plan choices. | |
| Specialist referral — confirm the clinical need | Determine whether a physical or behavioral health co-occurring condition calls for referral to a specialist or other provider and identify who recommended it. | RFA App. B §5.2 | Gather the reason, relevant assessment findings, current clinicians, and prior recommendations into a referral brief. | Yes | GUIDE clinician with dementia proficiency or another treating clinician makes the clinical determination. | |
| Specialist referral — explain the purpose | Explain why the referral is being considered and what the referred provider is expected to address. | RFA App. B §5.2 | Prepare approved plain-language information specific to the referral reason. | Yes | GUIDE clinician explains clinical purpose; care navigator reinforces logistics. | |
| Specialist referral — gather beneficiary preferences and barriers | Ask about provider choice, location, language, accessibility, appointment modality, schedule, transportation, and cost or coverage concerns. | RFA App. B §§5.2, 5.3 | Ask and record the standard preference and access questions. | Yes | Care navigator; beneficiary or authorized caregiver provides preferences. | |
| Specialist referral — identify candidate providers | Find specialists or other providers whose services appear to address the clinician-defined need and the beneficiary's practical needs. | RFA App. B §5.2 | Search approved directories and assemble candidates with specialty claims, location, language, accessibility, and available coverage information without inferring clinical capability. | Partial | L0/L1 verifies directory and operational facts; L2 elicits beneficiary preferences; L3/L4/L5 determines clinical suitability when needed. | |
| Specialist referral — support beneficiary choice | Present suitable options and help the beneficiary select without choosing for them. | RFA App. B §§5.2, 5.3; beneficiary freedom of choice | Compare the options against the beneficiary's stated preferences in plain language. | Yes | Care navigator supports; beneficiary or legal representative chooses. | |
| Specialist referral — verify provider availability and fit | Confirm that the chosen provider offers the requested service, serves the beneficiary's area, accepts new patients, and can meet material access needs. | RFA App. B §5.2 | Check current directory and scheduling information and prepare factual verification questions. | Partial | L1 verifies operational facts; L2 confirms preference fit; L3/L4/L5 resolves uncertain clinical capability. | |
| Specialist referral — determine whether the PCP is actively co-managing | Establish whether the PCP is actively co-managing the beneficiary so the referral can be made in consultation with the PCP when appropriate. | RFA App. B §5.2 | Summarize recent PCP involvement and ask the navigator to confirm the relationship. | Partial | Care navigator confirms; GUIDE clinician resolves clinical ambiguity. | |
| Specialist referral — consult the actively co-managing PCP | Discuss the proposed referral with the PCP before or while making it when the PCP is actively co-managing the beneficiary. | RFA App. B §5.2 | Draft the consultation message and provide the referral rationale and relevant care-plan information. | Yes | GUIDE clinician and/or care navigator communicates with the PCP; PCP provides input. | |
| Specialist referral — obtain required referral order or coverage information | Determine whether the specialist, payer, or receiving organization requires a clinician's referral order, authorization, or supporting documentation and obtain it. | RFA App. B §5.2; operational requirement | Identify stated requirements, assemble available materials, and show what is missing. | Partial | The ordering clinician supplies any clinical order; L1 pursues administrative order, coverage, and document requirements; L2 handles beneficiary-facing coordination. | |
| Specialist referral — send the referral | Deliver the referral request and required information to the selected provider through the accepted route. | RFA App. B §5.2 | Populate the referral packet, attach the approved material, prepare it for the verified destination, and record authorized release and delivery evidence. | Partial | L1 verifies the recipient and packet facts; L2 handles beneficiary-facing referral coordination; software applies the approved disclosure rule. The separate V1 release act remains blocked under O-021 until its canonical performer is named. | |
| Specialist referral — notify the PCP | Tell the beneficiary's PCP that the referral was made. | RFA App. B §5.2 | Prepare the required notice with the provider, clinical reason supplied by the clinician, and referral date; track authorized release and delivery. | Partial | L1 tracks delivery and corrects destination facts; L2 handles PCP or beneficiary coordination questions; software applies the approved disclosure rule. The separate V1 release act remains blocked under O-021 until its canonical performer is named. | |
| Specialist referral — notify the new provider of GUIDE participation when useful | Tell the specialist or other provider that the beneficiary participates in a dementia care management program when doing so supports coordination. | RFA App. B §5.2 | Prepare the optional approved GUIDE introduction as a distinct packet element. | Partial | L2 confirms the beneficiary-facing coordination purpose; software applies the approved disclosure rule. The separate V1 release act remains blocked under O-021 until its canonical performer is named. | |
| Specialist referral — provide relevant care-plan information | Send the receiving provider the current care plan or relevant portions through an allowed channel when useful for the visit. | RFA App. B §5.2 | Select the current approved plan or relevant portion, prepare it for the verified destination, and record authorized release and delivery evidence. | Partial | L1 verifies the recipient, current plan version, and destination; L2 confirms the coordination purpose; L3/L4/L5 supplies or reviews protected clinical content when required; software applies the approved disclosure rule. The separate V1 release act remains blocked under O-021 until its canonical performer is named. | |
| Specialist referral — introduce the beneficiary when requested | When the beneficiary or GUIDE caregiver requests it, make a human-authored introduction through an approved modality so the new provider understands the beneficiary's relevant history and return route. | RFA App. B §5.3 | Prepare the approved introduction content and logistics only after the separate disclosure basis, recipient, and content are confirmed. | Yes | An approved care-team member makes the introduction; the receiving provider participates. Closure distinguishes completion, withdrawal, capable-beneficiary conflict disposition, provider refusal, and explicit failed introduction with a next plan. | |
| Specialist referral — help schedule the visit | Assist the beneficiary with appointment scheduling and confirm the selected date, time, location, and modality. | RFA App. B §§5.2, 5.3; operational completion | Gather scheduling options, make calls or electronic requests, and send approved reminders. | Partial | L1 performs manual scheduling and status pursuit; L2 handles relationship-sensitive negotiation and beneficiary confirmation. | |
| Specialist referral — address practical barriers | Identify transportation, interpretation, accessibility, caregiver-availability, technology, or other barriers and hand community-service needs to the Referral and Coordination of Services and Supports work. | RFA App. B §§5.2, 5.5; handoff to §6 | Ask about common barriers, summarize them, and prepare the appropriate internal handoff. | Yes | Care navigator coordinates with the beneficiary and the community-services navigator or social worker. | |
| Specialist referral — confirm appointment disposition | Determine whether the visit was scheduled, completed, cancelled, declined, or missed. | RFA App. B §5.2 referral-loop requirement | Query available scheduling or encounter information and ask the beneficiary when no reliable result is available. | Partial | Care navigator confirms uncertain or conflicting information. | |
| Specialist referral — respond to a missed, cancelled, or declined visit | Ask what happened, address remediable barriers, reschedule when wanted, or return the referral question to the clinician when the plan must change. | RFA App. B §§5.2, 5.5 | Prepare outreach, show prior barriers and attempts, and offer the next logistical options. | Yes | Care navigator; beneficiary chooses whether to continue; GUIDE clinician revises the clinical approach when needed. | |
| Specialist referral — obtain visit documentation | Ensure that documentation from the specialist visit and any resulting care-plan changes or recommendations are received. | RFA App. B §5.2 | Detect missing return documentation, prepare a records request, ingest received material, and match it to the referral. | Partial | Software sends and tracks the approved request; L1 pursues missing administrative records; L2 clarifies a beneficiary relationship or permission fact only when needed; the outside provider or its records endpoint supplies or corrects the source record. Only a complete verified fact pattern exposing a genuine uncovered legal-authority question routes to Healthcare Legal Counsel under O-021. | |
| Specialist referral — pursue missing or incomplete documentation | Contact the provider when the returned record is absent, unreadable, for the wrong encounter, or lacks the recommendations needed to close the loop. | RFA App. B §5.2 | Identify the defect, prepare a specific follow-up request, and track repeated attempts. | Partial | L1 performs the administrative pursuit and identifies the defect; the outside provider or its records endpoint returns or corrects the source record; L2 enters only for a relationship-sensitive beneficiary question. | |
| Specialist referral — route recommendations for clinical review | Put the specialist's findings and recommendations before the appropriate GUIDE clinician and, when applicable, the PCP. | RFA App. B §§5.2, 5.3 | Extract and summarize recommendations, show their source, and deliver the original document with the summary. | Partial | GUIDE clinician reviews; care navigator resolves routing ambiguity. | |
| Specialist referral — clarify conflicting or incomplete recommendations | Resolve uncertainty when the recommendation conflicts with the care plan, another provider's advice, or the beneficiary's circumstances. | RFA App. B §§5.2, 5.5 | Compare the documents and draft focused clarification questions without deciding which clinical position is correct. | Yes | GUIDE clinician communicates with the specialist and/or PCP. | |
| Specialist referral — incorporate the reviewed outcome | Add accepted recommendations and resulting responsibilities to the care plan. | RFA App. B §§5.2, 5.3 | Draft the care-plan edits and identify affected follow-up tasks. | Partial | GUIDE clinician reviews clinical content; care navigator updates coordination content; beneficiary participates in choices. | |
| Specialist referral — explain the outcome and next work | Tell the beneficiary what was learned, what has changed, and who will do each next task. | RFA App. B §§5.2, 5.3 | Prepare a plain-language visit and follow-up summary. | Yes | GUIDE clinician explains clinical findings; care navigator explains coordination steps. | |
| Specialist referral — carry forward new work | Start any additional referral, test, treatment coordination, medication, or monitoring activity created by the visit. | RFA App. B §§5.2, 5.5 | Convert reviewed recommendations into a proposed task list and route each item to the appropriate person. | Partial | Care navigator assigns operational work; authorized clinicians own clinical orders and decisions. | |
| Transition — detect the move between home and a care setting | Learn that the beneficiary entered or left a hospital, emergency department, nursing facility, hospice, or another care setting. | RFA App. B §5.4 | Receive available admission, discharge, and transfer notices and match them to the beneficiary; also capture reports from people. | Partial | Care navigator validates uncertain notifications; beneficiary, caregiver, facility, or clinician may report the transition. | |
| Transition — establish the current situation | Confirm the setting, reason known to the team, transition date, current location, and whether another transition is planned. | RFA App. B §5.4 | Assemble available encounter and transition facts and identify contradictions or missing facts. | Partial | Care navigator confirms the facts with the beneficiary, caregiver, or facility. | |
| Transition — contact the beneficiary or caregiver | Ask what happened, what they understand, what they need now, and how they want the team to help. | RFA App. B §5.4 | Prepare a transition-specific call guide and summarize the response. | Yes | Care navigator; beneficiary or authorized caregiver. | |
| Transition — obtain transition records and instructions | Get available admission, discharge, transfer, medication, follow-up, and treatment information from the setting. | RFA App. B §5.4 | Gather accessible documents, send focused requests for missing material, and organize what arrives. | Partial | Software retrieves and tracks available records; L1 pursues missing administrative records and corrects destination facts; L2 clarifies beneficiary/caregiver relationship or permission facts only when needed; the facility or outside source supplies or corrects its source record. Only a genuine uncovered legal-authority question routes to Healthcare Legal Counsel under O-021. | |
| Transition — identify immediate needs and barriers | Check for symptoms, safety concerns, medications, equipment, food, housing, transportation, personal care, caregiver capacity, and follow-up needs created by the transition. | RFA App. B §5.4 | Ask a structured set of questions and summarize unmet needs for the care team. | Yes | Care navigator; registered nurse, social worker, or GUIDE clinician joins when the need exceeds nonclinical scope. | |
| Transition — obtain clinical or emergency response | Send urgent symptoms, safety concerns, or clinical uncertainty immediately to the appropriate clinician or emergency service. | RFA App. B §5.4; scope-of-practice requirement | Detect concerning statements, present the original information, and connect or alert the named human response route. | Yes | GUIDE clinician, registered nurse, on-call clinician, or emergency service, depending on urgency. | |
| Transition — start medication reconciliation | Trigger the Medication Management and Reconciliation work using the transition medication records and beneficiary report. | RFA App. B §5.4 | Assemble pre-transition, facility, discharge, pharmacy, household-supply, and reported-use information for the authorized medication reviewer. | Partial | L2 initiates; the transition actor remains subject to O-028 and the Participation Agreement. Prescribing authority is required whenever the work is also §7.1 reconciliation or determines the intended regimen. | |
| Transition — identify required follow-up visits | Determine which PCP, specialist, facility, home-health, hospice, laboratory, or other follow-up is expected and who is responsible for arranging it. | RFA App. B §§5.4, 5.5 | Extract follow-up instructions and compare them with already scheduled appointments. | Partial | Care navigator confirms logistics; GUIDE clinician resolves unclear or conflicting clinical instructions. | |
| Transition — arrange follow-up appointments | Help schedule or confirm the required visits and give the beneficiary the practical details. | RFA App. B §5.4 | Prepare scheduling requests, track responses, and send approved reminders. | Partial | L1 performs manual scheduling and status pursuit; L2 handles beneficiary-facing coordination; the beneficiary confirms availability. | |
| Transition — coordinate with involved healthcare providers | Notify and exchange relevant information with the PCP, specialists, facility, home health, hospice, pharmacy, and other healthcare providers involved in the transition. | RFA App. B §§5.4, 5.5 | Prepare source-linked, recipient-specific summaries for authorized release and track delivery, responses, and unresolved questions. | Partial | L2 performs relationship-dependent coordination; L1 verifies destinations and pursues administrative responses; L3/L4/L5 handles clinical questions and decisions; software applies the approved disclosure rule. The separate V1 release act remains blocked under O-021 until its canonical performer is named. | |
| Transition — hand community-service needs to the appropriate service | Send needs for meals, transportation, personal care, environmental support, or other community services to the Referral and Coordination of Services and Supports work. | RFA App. B §5.4; handoff to §6 | Convert identified needs and preferences into a complete internal referral. | Partial | Care navigator confirms the beneficiary wants the help; community-services navigator or social worker takes the referral. | |
| Transition — reinforce the transition instructions | Make sure the beneficiary knows the current plan, warning signs supplied by clinicians, follow-up, equipment or service arrangements, and whom to contact with questions. | RFA App. B §5.4 | Turn approved instructions into a plain-language checklist and identify apparent omissions for human review. | Yes | Care navigator reinforces approved instructions; GUIDE clinician or discharging clinician answers clinical questions. | |
| Transition — review returned clinical recommendations | Interpret new clinical information from the transition and decide whether the ongoing plan must change. | RFA App. B §§5.4, 5.5 | Summarize new findings and compare them with the existing care plan without making the clinical decision. | Yes | GUIDE clinician with dementia proficiency and other treating clinicians as applicable. | |
| Transition — update the care plan | Reflect the current setting, needs, providers, services, responsibilities, and accepted recommendations in the care plan. | RFA App. B §§5.4, 5.5 | Draft changes from reviewed information and show unresolved items. | Partial | Care navigator and GUIDE clinician; beneficiary or legal representative participates in person-centered choices. | |
| Transition — perform post-transition follow-up | Contact the beneficiary after the transition to determine whether appointments, medications, equipment, services, and the living arrangement are working and whether new problems have appeared. | RFA App. B §5.4 | Prepare the follow-up questions, gather available completion information, and summarize gaps. | Yes | Care navigator; beneficiary or authorized caregiver. | |
| Transition — continue unresolved work | Keep following each transition-related item until it is completed, declined by the beneficiary, or clearly accepted by the person or organization continuing it. | RFA App. B §§5.4, 5.5 | Maintain the task list, detect overdue work, send routine reminders, and show the responsible person and last action. | Partial | Care navigator owns follow-through and exception handling; beneficiary decides whether to accept optional help. | |
| Additional coordination — describe the need and desired result | Clarify an unmet dementia or co-occurring-condition coordination need not already covered above and ask what outcome the beneficiary wants. | RFA App. B §5.5 | Gather the relevant facts and produce a plain-language problem statement. | Yes | Care navigator with the beneficiary or authorized caregiver; GUIDE clinician joins for clinical needs. | |
| Additional coordination — identify the responsible person or organization | Determine who has the authority and practical ability to address the need. | RFA App. B §5.5 | Search the known care team, provider, and partner information and suggest possible owners. | Yes | Care navigator; GUIDE clinician identifies the appropriate clinical owner when needed. | |
| Additional coordination — gather and send what the recipient needs | Collect the relevant care-plan information, records, beneficiary preferences, and question, then make the contact or handoff. | RFA App. B §5.5 | Assemble a focused packet for the verified recipient and record authorized release, delivery, and response. | Partial | L2 confirms the relationship-dependent coordination need; L1 verifies the recipient and administrative packet facts; L3/L4/L5 supplies protected clinical content when required; software applies the approved disclosure rule. The separate V1 release act remains blocked under O-021 until its canonical performer is named. | |
| Additional coordination — obtain and route the response | Follow up, receive the answer or work product, and deliver it to the person who must review or act. | RFA App. B §5.5 | Track the request, send routine reminders, ingest the response, and route it with its source. | Partial | Care navigator resolves nonresponse, ambiguity, or wrong-recipient issues. | |
| Additional coordination — obtain human clinical judgment when needed | Send medical, behavioral-health, or other scope-limited questions to an appropriately qualified clinician rather than answering them administratively. | RFA App. B §5.5; RFA App. B §4.2.1 | Identify the unresolved clinical question and prepare the source information for review. | Yes | GUIDE clinician with dementia proficiency or the relevant treating clinician. | |
| Additional coordination — tell the beneficiary the result | Explain what was done, what response was received, what remains, and who is responsible for the next action. | RFA App. B §5.5 | Prepare a plain-language summary based on reviewed information. | Yes | Care navigator; clinician explains clinical decisions or recommendations. | |
| Additional coordination — reflect and pursue the outcome | Update the care plan as needed and begin any additional coordination work created by the result. | RFA App. B §5.5 | Draft relevant care-plan updates and a next-action list. | Partial | Care navigator; GUIDE clinician reviews clinical content; beneficiary participates in choices. |
Requirement, value, and clinical classificationReference table
For the RFA §5.2 specialist route, Necessary delivery work is conditional: the public RFA permits rather than universally requires the decision to refer. Once a referral is clinically authorized and chosen, the listed preparation and access steps are needed to make that route real, and the RFA's triggered PCP-notice, requested-introduction, documentation-return, and care-plan duties apply.
| Task | GUIDE standing | Customer-value position | Clinical lane | Why |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Outside-PCP coordination — identify the need | Necessary delivery work | Compliance infrastructure | No clinical judgment | Identifies when the §5.1 outside-PCP duty applies. |
| Outside-PCP coordination — confirm the current PCP | Necessary delivery work | Value through better execution | No clinical judgment | Prevents coordination with an obsolete or wrong practice. |
| Outside-PCP coordination — confirm the PCP is outside the team | Necessary delivery work | Compliance infrastructure | No clinical judgment | Applies the RFA condition against the current team roster. |
| Outside-PCP coordination — confirm participation and communication preferences | Necessary delivery work | Core customer value | No clinical judgment | Preserves the beneficiary's chosen participation and communication route. |
| Outside-PCP coordination — verify PCP routing information | Necessary delivery work | Compliance infrastructure | No clinical judgment | Makes required notice and plan exchange deliverable. |
| Outside-PCP coordination — notify the PCP of GUIDE participation | Public RFA care-delivery requirement | Compliance infrastructure | No clinical judgment | RFA §5.1 directly requires this notice. |
| Outside-PCP coordination — give the PCP access to the current care plan | Public RFA care-delivery requirement | Value through better execution | No clinical judgment | RFA §5.1 directly requires PCP access to the plan. |
| Outside-PCP coordination — send revised care plans | Public RFA care-delivery requirement | Value through better execution | No clinical judgment | RFA §5.1 directly includes updated and revised plans. |
| Outside-PCP coordination — request needed PCP information or input | Necessary delivery work | Value through better execution | Clinical review on trigger | Routine requests are navigational; clinical questions require clinician input. |
| Outside-PCP coordination — track the PCP response | Necessary delivery work | Value through better execution | No clinical judgment | Tracking makes the required coordination reliable. |
| Outside-PCP coordination — resolve failed delivery or nonresponse | Necessary delivery work | Value through better execution | No clinical judgment | Corrects a failed coordination route without interpreting care. |
| Outside-PCP coordination — route returned information | Necessary delivery work | Compliance infrastructure | No clinical judgment | Moves source material to its reviewer without deciding its meaning. |
| Outside-PCP coordination — review clinical information | Necessary delivery work | Core customer value | Clinical judgment required | Interpreting PCP information and deciding clinical effect is nondelegable. |
| Outside-PCP coordination — discuss resulting actions | Necessary delivery work | Core customer value | Clinical review on trigger | Navigators explain logistics; clinicians explain clinical recommendations. |
| Outside-PCP coordination — reflect the outcome in ongoing care | Necessary delivery work | Value through better execution | Clinical review on trigger | Routine updates are delegable; clinical content requires review. |
| Specialist referral — confirm the clinical need | Beyond the public GUIDE minimum | Core customer value | Clinical judgment required | RFA §5.2 permits rather than requires a specialist referral; if Proxi offers the route, referral necessity and specialty fit remain clinical decisions. |
| Specialist referral — explain the purpose | Necessary delivery work | Core customer value | Clinical review on trigger | Once a clinician and beneficiary choose the referral route, the navigator may relay the reviewed rationale; new interpretive questions return to the clinician. |
| Specialist referral — gather beneficiary preferences and barriers | Necessary delivery work | Core customer value | No clinical judgment | Once the branch is chosen, these preferences are needed to make the referral usable and belong to the beneficiary. |
| Specialist referral — identify candidate providers | Necessary delivery work | Core customer value | Clinical review on trigger | Directory matching implements the authorized referral; uncertain specialty fit goes to a clinician. |
| Specialist referral — support beneficiary choice | Necessary delivery work | Core customer value | No clinical judgment | The authorized referral still preserves the beneficiary's provider choice. |
| Specialist referral — verify provider availability and fit | Necessary delivery work | Value through better execution | Clinical review on trigger | Operational fit implements the authorized referral; doubtful clinical capability requires review. |
| Specialist referral — determine whether the PCP is actively co-managing | Necessary delivery work | Compliance infrastructure | No clinical judgment | This establishes whether the RFA's conditional PCP-consultation language applies to the chosen referral. |
| Specialist referral — consult the actively co-managing PCP | Necessary delivery work | Value through better execution | Clinical judgment required | Once the referral branch is chosen, the RFA says it should be made in consultation with an actively co-managing PCP. |
| Specialist referral — obtain required referral order or coverage information | Necessary delivery work | Compliance infrastructure | Clinical review on trigger | These steps implement the authorized referral; an order requires an authorized clinician. |
| Specialist referral — send the referral | Necessary delivery work | Core customer value | No clinical judgment | Sending the authorized referral implements the chosen route without making the clinical decision. |
| Specialist referral — notify the PCP | Public RFA care-delivery requirement | Compliance infrastructure | No clinical judgment | RFA §5.2 directly requires PCP notice after referral. |
| Specialist referral — notify the new provider of GUIDE participation when useful | Beyond the public GUIDE minimum | Value through better execution | No clinical judgment | RFA §5.2 permits but does not require this notice. |
| Specialist referral — provide relevant care-plan information | Beyond the public GUIDE minimum | Value through better execution | No clinical judgment | RFA §5.2 permits but does not require this optional sharing. |
| Specialist referral — introduce the beneficiary when requested | Public RFA care-delivery requirement | Core customer value | No clinical judgment | RFA §5.3 requires the requested human introduction. |
| Specialist referral — help schedule the visit | Necessary delivery work | Core customer value | No clinical judgment | Once the branch is chosen, scheduling turns the authorized referral into an accessible appointment. |
| Specialist referral — address practical barriers | Necessary delivery work | Core customer value | No clinical judgment | Once the branch is chosen, barrier resolution makes the authorized referral usable. |
| Specialist referral — confirm appointment disposition | Necessary delivery work | Value through better execution | No clinical judgment | Establishes whether the referral progressed to a visit. |
| Specialist referral — respond to a missed, cancelled, or declined visit | Necessary delivery work | Value through better execution | Clinical review on trigger | Logistics are delegable; changing the clinical plan requires review. |
| Specialist referral — obtain visit documentation | Public RFA care-delivery requirement | Value through better execution | No clinical judgment | RFA §5.2 requires return documentation to close the loop. |
| Specialist referral — pursue missing or incomplete documentation | Necessary delivery work | Value through better execution | No clinical judgment | Makes the required return of information reliable. |
| Specialist referral — route recommendations for clinical review | Necessary delivery work | Value through better execution | No clinical judgment | Routes recommendations without interpreting or accepting them. |
| Specialist referral — clarify conflicting or incomplete recommendations | Necessary delivery work | Core customer value | Clinical judgment required | Resolving conflicting clinical advice requires clinician judgment. |
| Specialist referral — incorporate the reviewed outcome | Public RFA care-delivery requirement | Value through better execution | Clinical review on trigger | RFA loop closure includes resulting care-plan changes. |
| Specialist referral — explain the outcome and next work | Necessary delivery work | Core customer value | Clinical review on trigger | A navigator may relay a clinician-reviewed result and next steps; interpretation or counseling remains with the clinician. |
| Specialist referral — carry forward new work | Necessary delivery work | Value through better execution | Clinical review on trigger | Routine routing is delegable; orders and treatment actions are clinical. |
| Transition — detect the move between home and a care setting | Necessary delivery work | Value through better execution | No clinical judgment | Detection starts the §5.4 transition service. |
| Transition — establish the current situation | Necessary delivery work | Value through better execution | No clinical judgment | Confirms factual transition details before action. |
| Transition — contact the beneficiary or caregiver | Necessary delivery work | Core customer value | Clinical review on trigger | Routine outreach is delegable; symptoms and safety concerns trigger review. |
| Transition — obtain transition records and instructions | Necessary delivery work | Value through better execution | No clinical judgment | Obtains source instructions without interpreting them. |
| Transition — identify immediate needs and barriers | Necessary delivery work | Core customer value | Clinical review on trigger | Navigators collect needs; clinical or safety findings go to a clinician. |
| Transition — obtain clinical or emergency response | Necessary delivery work | Core customer value | Clinical review on trigger | The navigator sends the concern and invokes the urgent route; the receiving clinician or emergency professional assesses and decides disposition. |
| Transition — start medication reconciliation | Public RFA care-delivery requirement | Core customer value | Clinical review on trigger | RFA §5.4 requires transition medication reconciliation but does not name its actor; O-028 and the Participation Agreement control that route, while §7.1 reconciliation and regimen decisions require prescribing authority. |
| Transition — identify required follow-up visits | Necessary delivery work | Core customer value | Clinical review on trigger | Extracting instructions is routine; conflicts require clinical resolution. |
| Transition — arrange follow-up appointments | Necessary delivery work | Core customer value | No clinical judgment | Scheduling implements the reviewed transition plan. |
| Transition — coordinate with involved healthcare providers | Public RFA care-delivery requirement | Value through better execution | Clinical review on trigger | Coordination is required; clinical questions remain with clinicians. |
| Transition — hand community-service needs to the appropriate service | Necessary delivery work | Core customer value | No clinical judgment | Routes nonclinical support needs to the correct GUIDE service. |
| Transition — reinforce the transition instructions | Necessary delivery work | Core customer value | Clinical review on trigger | Approved instructions may be reinforced; new clinical questions are escalated. |
| Transition — review returned clinical recommendations | Necessary delivery work | Core customer value | Clinical judgment required | Interpretation and plan effect require a clinician. |
| Transition — update the care plan | Necessary delivery work | Value through better execution | Clinical review on trigger | Coordination facts are delegable; clinical changes require review. |
| Transition — perform post-transition follow-up | Necessary delivery work | Core customer value | Clinical review on trigger | Follow-up is navigational until symptoms or clinical concerns appear. |
| Transition — continue unresolved work | Necessary delivery work | Value through better execution | Clinical review on trigger | Tracking is delegable; unresolved clinical issues remain clinician-owned. |
| Additional coordination — describe the need and desired result | Necessary delivery work | Core customer value | Clinical review on trigger | The navigator frames the need and escalates medical complexity. |
| Additional coordination — identify the responsible person or organization | Necessary delivery work | Value through better execution | Clinical review on trigger | Operational ownership is delegable; clinical ownership may require review. |
| Additional coordination — gather and send what the recipient needs | Necessary delivery work | Value through better execution | No clinical judgment | Performs factual exchange after the need and recipient are established. |
| Additional coordination — obtain and route the response | Necessary delivery work | Value through better execution | No clinical judgment | Closes the communication loop without interpreting the response. |
| Additional coordination — obtain human clinical judgment when needed | Necessary delivery work | Core customer value | Clinical review on trigger | The navigator prepares and routes the question; the receiving clinician supplies the non-delegable judgment. |
| Additional coordination — tell the beneficiary the result | Necessary delivery work | Core customer value | Clinical review on trigger | Navigators explain operations; clinicians explain clinical conclusions. |
| Additional coordination — reflect and pursue the outcome | Necessary delivery work | Value through better execution | Clinical review on trigger | Routine updates and follow-through escalate when clinical content appears. |